ARTICLE
Rethinking How We Respond to AI-Generated Redlines
Contract negotiators have long traded redlines. Those drafts represent a party’s priorities and judgment applied to the specific transaction. But things have changed. We now have counterparties and clients who send us markups without any meaningful human input.
FREE CONTRACT TRAINING
Upcoming CLE Webinars
Register for an upcoming webinar by clicking the webinar entry. You can also sign up for our automatic option that registers you for every webinar with two weeks to watch the replay.
FROM OUR SPONSOR
A Guide to Standardized Contracts From Spellbook
This guide from Spellbook, our sponsor, explains how in-house legal teams standardize contracts with templates, clause libraries, and playbooks. It identifies which contract types fit standardization, such as NDAs, offer letters, and low-value vendor agreements, and which do not. It describes the risks of over-standardizing, including template rot and lost leverage on high-value deals. It also includes a seven-step process for building contract standards and the governance practices that keep them current. The guide is available as a download.
MEME OF THE WEEK
That Contract Negotiation Counterparty

Nothing builds trust in a new business relationship like sending me documents that I can't edit.
#TheContractStruggleIsReal
CONTRACT TIP
How to Handle Stalled Negotiations on a Single Provision
This contract tip is about dealing with stalled negotiations.
You make changes to the contract, the other side reverses those changes and makes new edits, you reverse their edits and restore your own. Sometimes we reach that point that neither party is moving. It is a classic case of brinkmanship, with each attorney waiting it out to see who would blink first.
When we are making progress in a negotiation on the other provisions, I don't necessarily see a lot of back and forth on a single provision as a bad thing.
If we aren't making progress and don't have an easy resolution in sight, I often suggest that we defer any further discussion of the issue until the end. Then I'll put the disputed language or section in brackets with a note that it is on hold.
I find this approach often does the trick.
It takes the pressure off and allows us time to resolve other parts of the contract. With the other issues mostly resolved, it is a lot easier to settle the handful of difficult ones left. If a delay isn't an option, I may do the opposite and make it front and center. I'd set up a call with the other side to discuss that one provision. The key in these cases is to get past the wording and talk about each side's worries about risk and consequences. Then we brainstorm together on ways to address the concerns.
If we reach the end of the negotiation and still haven't decided, then I have that talk with the decision-maker on my side if I do not have the final say on it. I explain why I pushed back and what the risks are. Then that person makes the call.
Do you have an approach to stalled negotiations that you like to use?
🙏🏻Thanks for subscribing and being part of our contracts community!
We appreciate you trusting How to Contract to email you practical real-world contract training insights and strategies.
If you’d like to take your training to the next level, check out the How to Contract membership. We offer 12 months of access to 30 hours of courses (including live CLE sessions every spring and fall), 500+ rows of my contract playbook, and a massive 240+ hour library of videos featuring contracting superstars and me (including 120+ hours of training webinars created since March 2025).
Was this email forwarded to you? Subscribe here.
Let us know if you have any questions or feedback by replying to this email or emailing us directly at [email protected]. We are so grateful for our amazing contracts community.
All my best,
Laura Frederick, Founder and CEO @ How to Contract











